Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43052 (BOM)

JAYPRAKASH RADHESHYAM BHARADIYA v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTOR OFFICE AND ORS

WP/14405/2024 · 2025-04-21

Shri N J Jamadar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

903-wp-14405-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.14405 OF 2024 Jayprakash Radheshyam Bharadiya … Petitioner V/s. The District Collector, Collector Office and Ors. … Respondents ------------------- Mr. Imtiyaz Khairdi with Mayank Tripathi, for the Petitioner. Ms. Deepti Thorat I.by Jagdish Aradwad (Reddy), for the respondent no. 3. Mr. Jay Salunkhe h/f Mr. Nitin Gaware Patil, for the respondent nos. 6, 7 and 8. Ms. Aloka Nadkarni, AGP, for the State. -------------------- CORAM : N.J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 29TH APRIL 2025. PC: 1. This is for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 21st April 2025. 2. In the said order, in Para No. 3 and Para No. 12, the word ‘Gat No. 1390’ shall be read as ‘Gat No. 1310’. 3. Paragraph No. 15 be substituted as under: Thirdly, the Court is informed that, subsequently, the applications preferred by the plaintiff for measurement have been rejected by the authorities, and the appeals varsha 1 of 2 VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date: 2025.05.03 15:22:05 +0530 903-wp-14405-2024.doc preferred thereagainst are pending. Thus, at this stage, the prayer of continuation of the restraint in terms of the order on application (Exhibit-46), cannot be countenanced. 4. Corrections be made and corrected order be uploaded. (N.J. JAMADAR, J) varsha 2 of 2