Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46492] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15020/2025 Sachin S/o Kalyan Singh, R/o Gurjarpura, Panchayat Neemkheda, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur (Presently Confined In Jail At Dholpur). ----Applicant Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Arpit Srivastava For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 18/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 342/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Dholpur District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 112(2), 281, 132, 109(1) of BNS, 2023, Section 3 of PDPP Act, 1984, Section 29, 51 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972, Sections 41, 42 of Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953, Sections 3(1), 25(1B), 5(1)(A) & 25(1)(a) of Arms Act (Amended) 2019.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused–applicant has submitted that applicant is the sole bread earner of the family and there are no criminal antecedents against the applicant. It is further submitted the applicant is in custody ever since 19.10.2025. It is also submitted that the co-accused, on similar facts, has already been enlarged on bail vide an order dated 10.11.2025 passed in
[2025:RJ-JP:46492] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15020/2025] Sunil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, reported in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14538/2025.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. Howsoever, not able to refute the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the applicant.
4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact that applicant is the sole bread earner of the family; that there are no criminal antecedents against the applicant; that the co-accused, on similar
facts, has already been enlarged on bail vide an order dated 10.11.2025 and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the instant bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Sachin S/o Kalyan Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-401