Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9813-2025 Date of decision: 07.04.2025 Nirmaljit Kaur …. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others ….. Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. P.S. Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner.
ARUN PALLI, J (Oral) Having argued the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prior to the institution of the petition, the petitioner had even served the respondent authorities with a representation dated March 28, 2025(P-6), as regards her concerns/grievances, but to no avail. He submits, for the present, he be permitted to withdraw the petition, to enable the petitioner to pursue the matter with the respondent-Municipal Council, Zirakpur, in the first instance. Mr. Shekhar Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, is requested to appear on behalf of the respondents. He submits that in the event any representation is pending, the same shall be taken cognizance of, and dealt with, in accordance with law. In the wake of the position sketched out above and in terms of the statements made by learned counsel for the parties, the petition is accordingly disposed of.
(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 07.04.2025 deepak Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2025.04.08 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh