[2025:RJ-JP:46504] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17242/2025 Abhishek Mathur S/o Late Shri Premnarayn Mathur, aged about 35 years, R/o House No. 2294, Jahalaniyo Ka Rasta, Opposite Devdas Ki Bagichi Ki Gali, First Chouraha of Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) Presently Residing At House No. 3- M.A- 585, Indra Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Ramesh Dhobhi S/o Nathulal, R/o 37/31, First Floor, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Adil For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 18/11/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the learned Tribunal to expeditiously dispose of the Eviction Petition No. 336/2024 as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition was filed by the petitioner in the year 2024 and thereafter the respondent has moved an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, however, nearly one year has been passed but the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC has not been decided yet. Therefore, he prays that the disposal of the Eviction Petition No. 336/2024 as well as the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11, CPC may kindly be expedited and disposed of within a specified time. [2025:RJ-JP:46504] (2 of 3) [CW-17242/2025] 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar and perused the material available on record. 4. From a bare perusal of the order-sheets, it is reflected that the eviction petition was filed only in 2024, wherein the matter is listed for arguments on the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11. 5. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi vs. State of Maharashtra1 while relying upon the constitutional Bench judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of U.P.2, has deprecated the practice of the Courts issuing directions to the subordinate Courts to decide the matter within a timeline, the relevant extract of para 47.3 of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad (Supra) is reproduced as under: “47.3. Constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other courts. Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time- bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending;" 6. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to issue a direction to the learned Rent Tribunal to decide the pending eviction petition No.336/2024 within a time-bound manner. 7. The concerned Rent Tribunal is expected to regulate its own procedure in respect of the cases on board for effective disposal and to ensure that the cases are disposed of expeditiously within a reasonable period of time; while doing so, it is also expected from 1 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3526 2 2024 INSC 150 [2025:RJ-JP:46504] (3 of 3) [CW-17242/2025] the learned Rent Tribunal that they will not entertain unnecessary and unwarranted requests for adjournment. 8. It is further directed to the learned Rent Tribunal to decide pending application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC on the next date of hearing or within 15 days thereafter. 9. With the aforesaid direction, the present civil writ petition is disposed of. 10. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /78