IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (105) CWP No. 9736 of 2025 Date of Decision : 07.04.2025 Amarjeet Kaur ...Petitioner Versus Harinderpal Singh Sidhu and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Arun Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aadil Singh Baparai, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently, the description of the property which is sought to be taken back under The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as ‘2007 Act’) has not been given properly. Learned counsel submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars giving the details of the property being owned by the respondents and as to how, the respondents became owners of all the properties in question and how the petitioner got the property, which was given to respondents’ son. The present petition is disposed of, with liberty as prayed for. April 07, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) kanchan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No Kanchan 2025.04.09 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment