Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43043 (CHH)

DEEPAK PANDEY v. HEMIN BAI

CR/209/2024 · 2025-04-04

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 209 of 2024 1 - Deepak Pandey S/o Pradeep Pandey Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Maro, Tehsil Navagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. (Defendant No. 9) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Hemin Bai D/o Late Gorelal Aged About 35 Years W/o Shri Bhuvan Singh Joshi, R/o Village Gunsari, P.S. And Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- (Plaintiff) 2 - Smt. Shakuntala Pandey W/o Lt. Ramkumar Pandey Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Maro, Tehsil Navagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. --- (Defendant No. 1). 3 - Nand Kishor Pandey S/o Late Ramkumar Pandey Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Maro, Tehsil Navagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. --- (Defendant No. 2). 4 - Jugal Kishor Pandey S/o Late Ramkumar Pandey Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Maro, Tehsil Navagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. --- (Defendant No. 3). 5 - Jawahar Pandey S/o Late Gokul Prasad Pandey Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Maro, Tehsil Navagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. --- (Defendant No. 4). 6 - Ram Ishwar Pandey S/o Late Gokul Prasad Pandey Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Maro, Tehsil Navagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. --- (Defendant No. 5). 7 - Parmeshwar Pandey S/o Late Gokul Prasad Pandey Aged About 50 Years R/o A ANNAJEE RAO Digitally signed by A ANNAJEE RAO 2 Village Maro, Tehsil Navagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. --- (Defendant No. 6). 8 - Jagdish Pandey S/o Late Gokul Prasad Pandey Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Maro, Tehsil Navagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. --- (Defendant No. 7). 9 - Pradeep Pandey S/o Late Gokul Prasad Pandey Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Maro, Tehsil Navagarh, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. --- (Defendant No. 8). ... Respondents ….. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Order on Board 04/04/2025 On a mention slip being submitted by Mr. Tapak Kumar Chandra, Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the matter is taken-up. This revision has been filed Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition. As prayed, this Civil Revision (CR No.209/2024) is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Rao