Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43039 (RAJ)

RADHEYSHYAM S/O GIRDHARI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/28/2025 · 2025-02-28

Bhuwan Goyal, Narendra Singh Dhaddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8845-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 28/2025 Radheyshyam S/o Girdhari, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Hanotiya Lodhan Bhutiya Ka Pura Police Station Dangipura District Jhalawar (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Home Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat Jaipur 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj). 3. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Raj). 4. Superintendent Of Police, Jhalawar (Raj). 5. Inspector General Of Police Range, Jhalawar (Raj). 6. Sho, Police Station Dangipura, District Jhalawar (Raj). 7. Pappu Alias Papliya S/o Sardar, Resident Of Village Fatehpur District Guna (Mp) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG Mr. Vijendra Singh, S.I. S.H.O. with Ms. Mamta MFC Belt No. 1332, P.S. Dangipura, District Jhalawar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 28/02/2025 1. The instant habeas corpus petition has been preferred by the petitioner-father seeking custody of corpus- his daughter. [2025:RJ-JP:8845-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-28/2025] 2. In pursuance to the order dated 24.01.2025, the corpus - Mst "M" has been produced before this Court by Mr. Vijendra Singh, S.I. S.H.O. with Ms. Mamta MFC Belt No. 1332, P.S. Dangipura, District Jhalawar. 3. The S.H.O. P.S. Dangipura has produced factual report dated 27.02.2025 along with order dated 25.02.2025 passed by Child Welfare Committee, Jhalawar before this Court, which are taken on record. As per said factual report as well as order of the CWC, age of the corpus has been declared as 20 years. 4. We conferred with her. With full confidence and composure, she stated that she is 20 years of age and she is not illegally confined. She does not want to go with her father. 5. In this background, we set the corpus at liberty. She is free to proceed as per her desire. 6. The concerned police officials who are present in the court, shall ensure that proper security is given to corpus till she reaches at the destination where she wishes to go. 7. The habeas corpus petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J INDER/C-1