ASMAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT S/O SHRI KISHORE SINGH SHEKHAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8165/2025 · 2025-12-16
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43037 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43037 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50813] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8165/2025
1. Asman Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Kishore Singh Shekhawat, aged about 48 Years, Resident of Plot No. 2, Satya Nagar, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan.
2. Anju Kanwar W/o Shri Asman Singh Shekhawat, aged about 45 Years, Resident of Plot No. 2, Satya Nagar, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan.
3. Visvendra Singh S/o Asman Singh Shekhawat, aged about 20 Years, Resident of Plot No. 2, Satya Nagar, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through PP, Jaipur.
2. Vikas Soni S/o Satyanarayan Soni, age about 43 Years, Resident of 111, Devdhara Colony, Murlipura, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi with Mr. Jai Khedia For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 16/12/2025
1. By way of this Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.509/2025 registered at Police Station Jhotwara, District Jaipur (West) (Rajasthan), for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 351(3), 308(6) & 61(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 on the basis of compromise.
2. Complainant and petitioner No.3 are present in person and they have duly been identified by their counsel.
[2025:RJ-JP:50813] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8165/2025]
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.509/2025 registered at Police Station Jhotwara, District Jaipur (West) (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /278