CWP-9988-2025 (O&M) 136 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Anshul Nagpal Haryana Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Ms. Saanvi Singla, SUDHIR SINGH Present nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned clause 17 of the e policy/brochure dated 20.07.2022 (Annexure P to the Constitution of quashing action of the respondents Plot No.118GP, 14 Marla Plot, Sector 5, Hansi, regarding, which was conducted on 18.12.2022 and the petitioner per demand of the respondents, he had also deposited the H1 amoun 19.12.2022 itself, but the respondents without assigning any reason, reimbursed the H1 amount into the petitioner’s account on 17.01.2023. 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Anshul Nagpal versus Haryana Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Mr. Parshant Sethi, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition herein, inter alia Certiorari for quashing the impugned clause 17 of the e policy/brochure dated 20.07.2022 (Annexure P to the Constitution of India. Further a writ of Certiorari quashing action of the respondents in again conducting e Plot No.118GP, 14 Marla Plot, Sector 5, Hansi, regarding, which was conducted on 18.12.2022 and the petitioner per demand of the respondents, he had also deposited the H1 amoun 19.12.2022 itself, but the respondents without assigning any reason, reimbursed the H1 amount into the petitioner’s account on 17.01.2023. 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9988-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: April 07, 2025 ….Petitioner another ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR for the petitioner. the respondents. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ in the Certiorari for quashing the impugned clause 17 of the e-auction policy/brochure dated 20.07.2022 (Annexure P-2) being illegal and ultra-vires of Certiorari has been sought for in again conducting e-auction of the same Plot No.118GP, 14 Marla Plot, Sector 5, Hansi, regarding, which e-auction was conducted on 18.12.2022 and the petitioner had made highest bid and as per demand of the respondents, he had also deposited the H1 amount on 19.12.2022 itself, but the respondents without assigning any reason, reimbursed the H1 amount into the petitioner’s account on 17.01.2023. 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s in the auction vires has been sought for auction of the same auction made highest bid and as on 19.12.2022 itself, but the respondents without assigning any reason, MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.11 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-9988-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner confines his prayer to refund H1 amount in respect to the plot in question without assigning any reason. He further submits that his case is covered by the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in CWP-10019- 2024 titled as Asha versus Haryana Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran and another, on 02.05.2024. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned counsel for the respondents appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that case of the petitioner will be considered in light of aforesaid decision. 4. Considering the aforesaid and without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of in light of the decision in CWP-10019- 2024 (supra). 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE April 07, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.11 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment