Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4303 (GAU)

M/s Mingkih Enterprises and Anr v. The State of AP and 4 Ors

WP(C)/114/2025 · 2025-03-23

Parthivjyoti Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040004052025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/114/2025 M/s Mingkih Enterprises and Anr Proprietor Shri Konying Saring, Village Parbuk, PO and PS Roing, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh 792110 2: Soblam Malo Age: Occupation : Son of Naido Malo Khupa Township PO and PS Hayuliang Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh an authorized person of M/s Mingkih Enterprise VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 791111 2:The Principal Secretary PWD Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 791111 3:The Chief Engineer (Eastern Zone) Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 791111 4:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Page No.# 2/2 Tezu Circle Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Hayuliang Division Anjaw District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Reken Ingo, Sonam Tsomo,Kebom Taso,Tado Siga,Tali Umbey,Kipa Yabi,Aruna Rai,Dani Rieyang,Jumken Ete,S D Loda Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 24.03.2025 Heard Ms. Chanya Bangsia, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents. Ms. C. Bangsia, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the present writ petition has become infractuous and therefore, she seeks to withdraw the same. After hearing the learned counsels for both the side, the prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant