\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3869 OF 2019 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,CRP being aggrieved by the order dated 11-11-2019 made in I.A. No. 740/2019 in O.S. NO. 301/2018 on the file of the court of the VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. Between: Mandava Srinivas, S/o.Hanumaiftha Rao, Hindu, aged about 47 years, Business, M/s.Sri Sai Marketing, Plot No.D4 and 5, Road No.3, Industrial Estate, Autonagar, Vijayawada-7, Krishna District ...PETITIONER AND Narla Subhas Chandra Rao, S/o;Wamana Rao, Hindu, aged about 63 years. Pensioner, R/o.Flat No.104, Soubhagya Towers, Suryaraopet, Vijayawada,Krishna District. ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.301 of 2018 on the file of VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge Court at Vijayawada u. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. V SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondents:-- The Court made the following:ORDER J x-.. APHC010435732019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY. THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3869/2019 Between: ...PETITIONER Mandava Srinivas AND ...RESPONDENT Narla Subhas Chandra Rao Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.VSUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 2 The Court made the following order; The present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the Order, dated 11.11.2019 in I.A.No.740 of 2019 in O.S.No.301 of 2018, on the file of the VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the cause in the 2. present Civil Revision Petition does not survive. The above submission is placed on record, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is 3. dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. 4. SDI- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The VII Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Vijayawada,Krishn a District. 2. One CC to Sri. V Subrahmanyam, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED :31/01/2025 ORDER CRP.No.3869 of 2019 *5^ AND##] 11 m 2025 " Current beciien ^ ton CRP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS