Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(Sr. No. 109)
CWP No. 9733 of 2025
Date of decision: 05.04.2025
Amrinder Singh ..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Present : Mr. B. S. Khaira, Advocate for the petitioner.
(appeared through video conferencing)
Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. A. G., Punjab.
* * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation dated 03.03.2025 (Annexure P-2), made on behalf of the petitioner. (2)
Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. (3)
Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation dated 03.03.2025 (Annexure P-2), made on behalf of the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after SUNIL YADAV 2025.04.10 13:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh
CWP No.9733 of 2025 [2]
affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (4)
Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
(DEEPAK SIBAL)
JUDGE
05.04.2025
( HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN ) sunil yadav
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No SUNIL YADAV 2025.04.10 13:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh