Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43012 (ALL)

MOOLCHANDRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/4929/2025 · 2025-04-17

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:57865 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4929 of 2025 Petitioner :- Moolchandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Susmita Yadav,Uday Bhan Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner wants certain benefits taking into account the adhoc service that he has rendered in the respondent establishment prior to his regularization in the establishment. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that in the above regard petitioner has represented the matter before the competent authority namely the respondent no. 3 on 03.01.2025 which may be directed to be disposed of in accordance with law. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 3 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 3 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to add the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 18.4.2025 IrfanUddin Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad