Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4301 (RAJ)

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1261/2025 · 2025-02-03

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4623] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1261/2025 Central Bank Of India, Anand Bhawan, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur Through Its Chief Manager Mr. S.k. Jain. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Deputy Registrar, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. M/s Bal Krishan Commercial Company Ltd., Through Director Sh. Sahil Jain, Anand Bhawan, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mutha For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 03/02/2025 1. By means of filing instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner-Central Bank of India has raised a limited grievance that the Revision Petition No.2598/2016 filed against the order dated 14.09.2016 by the Collector Stamps, Jaipur First, Jaipur, is pending before the Tax Board Tribunal, Ajmer since 14.12.2016 and being adjourned time and again for one or another reason, which are not attributed to the petitioner. The limited prayer of counsel for petitioner is that the pending Revision Petition be directed to be heard and decided on merits expeditiously as early as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks. It has been submitted that the petitioner-Bank has deposited the requisite amount to maintain the Revision Petition before the Tax Board. [2025:RJ-JP:4623] (2 of 2) [CW-1261/2025] 2. Having considered the grievance of petitioner and after perusal of relevant order-sheets placed on record, it is apparent that the Revision Petition was filed by the petitioner way back on 14.12.2016 and same is still pending for hearing before the Tax Board Tribunal, Ajmer. 3. Considering the order passed by the Collector Stamps and the scope of Revision Petition involved therein, it is hereby directed that the Tax Board Tribunal shall hear and decide the Revision Petition expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period six months, if there is no stay of any Court on the further proceedings. 4. With aforesaid observations, instant writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 6. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned Tribunal for compliance. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /29