Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040003392021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/98/2021 Smti.Phefot Baham W/O SHRI AJAY MURTEM, PRESENTLY SERVING AS BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (INCHARGE), NAMSANG CD BLOCK, DEOMALI, PO/PS DEOMALI, DIST. TIRAP, AP. VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Others REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY/COMMISSIONER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF AP, ITANAGAR. 2:THE DIRECTOR Age: 0 Occupation : RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR. 3:SHRI KAPA RAI Age: 0 Occupation : PRESENTLY SERVING AS BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (OFFICIATING) YUPIA PAPUM PARE DIST. AP. 4:SHRI TASAR DEBIA Age: 0 Occupation : PRESENTLY SERVING AS BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (OFFICIATING) ZIRO LOWER SUBANSIRI DIST. AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Rintu Saikia, Ligam Nochi,Hongmo Ete,Limi Bam,Bomchi Taipodia,Idak Bam Advocate for the Respondent : Binter Picha, SC (RD),Damin Taggu,D Riba,Nikita Danggen,Oken Page No.# 2/2 Duggong,Oyina Perme,Tate Tatak,K Chotton,Y Dagiam,P Siga,Lissing Perme,Krishna Dubey,Hero Tayo,William Yirang,Wintet Sawin,A Perme,T Gamlin,Signal Yirang BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO O R D E R 08.09.2025 Mr. Idak Bam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition. Ms. N. Danggen, learned counsel appears for respondent No.4 and Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate appears for official respondents and they submit that they have no objection to the prayer. In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. It is also provided herein that if fresh cause of action arises, the petitioner will be at liberty to approach this Court as may be permissible in law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant