Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42999 (PNJ)

VIDYA AND ANOTHER v. KAILASHO & OTHERS

RSA/3812/2001 · 2025-07-07

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-3812-2001(O&M) 219 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3812-2001(O&M) Date of Decision :-07.07.2025 Vidya and another .......Appellants Versus Kailasho and another .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: None **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. As per office report, appellant No.1 has expired and appellant No.2 has been duly served. However, there is no representation on his behalf. Both the respondents have also reported to have expired. None has come forward to pursue the appeal. Appellants have remained unrepresented on previous two occasions. It seems that they are not interested in pursuing the appeal. 2. Dismissed in default for non-prosecution. 3. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall stand disposed off. 07.07.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) Brij JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No BRIJ MOHAN 2025.07.08 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh