IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2512 OF 2011 Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C, aggrieved by the order dt. 12-8-2011 in Criminal Revision Petition No.21/2011 on the file of the Ilird Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anantapur and allow the present CRL.R.C. Between: K.V.Thippanna, S/o G.Anjinappa aged 72 years, R/o Veligonda Village, Uravakonda Mandal, Anantapur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. K.V.Sakunthalamma, W/o K.V.Thippanna, aged 65 years, R/o Veligonda Village,Uravakonda Mandal, Anantapur District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its, Public Prosecutor, High court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi. ...Respondents I.A. NO: 2 OF 2011fCRLRCMP. NO: 3804 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be . • * -^1 t pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the order dated 12- 08-2011, in Criminal Revision Petition No.21/2011 Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anantapur pending Revision Case, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. KUMMATHI VENKATESULU on the file of the Ilird Criminal Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following : IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2512/2011 APHC010014052011 [3521] sS-5 Between: ...PETITIONER K.v.thippanna AND ...RESPONDENT(S) K V Sakunthalamma and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KUMMATHl VENKATESULU Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 07.04.2025, directed to submit arguments This Court, on about the maintainability of the Revision Case, which is filed the order dated 12.08.2011 passed in Criminal Revision against Petition No.21 of 2011 by the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ananthapur, by the very same party. A Revision against the revision petition is not maintainable as per Section 397 (3) of the Code of Criminal Proced ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jagir Singh v. Ranbir Singh and another ^ and Baban and others v. Sambamurthy and another^. In view of an embargo under Section 397 (3) of the Cr.P.C. and as per the ratio laid down in the above judgments, as the present Criminal Revision Case is filed by the very same party, against the order dated 12.08.2011 in Criminal Revision Petition No.21 of 2011 passed by the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ananthapur, this revision case is liable to be dismissed. V \ ■ \ 1973 and as per the ure Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as not maintainable. 979) 1 see 560 ^ 1980 eRLJ248/1979 See online AP 165 Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE eOPY// SEetrON OFFieER To, 1. The Ilird Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anantapur (with records) 2. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Uravakonda, Anantapur. (with records) 3. One CC to Sri. Kummathi Venkatesulu, Advocate [OPUC] 4. .Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 6. Three CD Copies PR vna \ V HIGH COURT DATED:09/04/2025 \ \ ORDER CRLRC.No.2512 of 2011 DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS NOT MAINTAINABLE