GHANSHYAM SHARMA S/O SHRI MOOL CHAND SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/19235/2025 · 2025-12-08
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42969 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42969 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49959] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19235/2025 Ghanshyam Sharma S/o Shri Mool Chand Sharma, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Kesar Vihar Surajkund Road, Chaksu District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest, Aranaya Bhawan, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur.
2. Chief Conservator Of Forest, Aranaya Bhawan, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur.
3. Dy. Conservator Of Forest, Aranaya Bhawan, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brij Mohan Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“(1) By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may be directed to revise the pay scale of the petitioner as per rules and grant him grade pay of Rs 2400/- and 2800/- due to him as on 01.4.2008, 01.7.2013
and
01.4.2017
after completion of 18 and 27 years of satisfactory service with all consequential benefits. (Il) Any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deem just and proper in the facts and
[2025:RJ-JP:49959] (2 of 2) [CW-19235/2025] circumstances of the case may be granted to the petitioner on completion of 18 and 27 years of his satisfactory service payable on 01.04.2008, 01.07.2013 and 01.04.2017 as per Rules and Government orders during pendency of the writ petition.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /287