IIIINNNN TTTTHHHHEEEE HHHHIIIIGGGGHHHH CCCCOOOOUUUURRRRTTTT OOOOFFFF PPPPUUUUNNNNJJJJAAAABBBB &&&& HHHHAAAARRRRYYYYAAAANNNNAAAA AAAATTTT CCCCHHHHAAAANNNNDDDDIIIIGGGGAAAARRRRHHHH 232 CRM-M-19459-2025 Date of decision: July 1st, 2025 Pankaj Kumar and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CCCCOOOORRRRAAAAM M M M:::: HHHHOOOONNNN''''BBBBLLLLEEEE M M M MRRRRSSSS.... JJJJUUUUSSSSTTTTIIIICCCCEEEE M M M MAAAANNNNJJJJAAAARRRRIIII NNNNEEEEHHHHRRRRUUUU KKKKAAAAUUUULLLL Present: Mr. Sayyam Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Karan Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Arsh Bhatti, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. M M M MAAAANNNNJJJJAAAARRRRIIII NNNNEEEEHHHHRRRRUUUU KKKKAAAAUUUULLLL,,,, JJJJ.... ((((OOOORRRRAAAALLLL)))) Prayer in the instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.264 dated 09.09.2021 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 201, 506, 307 of the IPC (Sections 201 and 307 of the IPC added and Section 3 of SC & ST Act deleted later on), registered at Police Station Kheripul, District Faridabad and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 26.03.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. Vide order dated 08.04.2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 08.05.2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. 3. Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad, in pursuance of the directions PUNEET SACHDEVA 2025.07.01 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CCCCRRRRM M M M----M M M M----11119999444455559999----2222000022225555 ----2222---- of this Court, wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed. 4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report. 5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and the private respondents are the only aggrieved persons in the FIR in question. 6. In view of the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad, and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in GGGGiiiiaaaannnn SSSSiiiinnnngggghhhh VVVVssss.... SSSSttttaaaatttteeee ooooffff PPPPuuuunnnnjjjjaaaabbbb aaaannnndddd ooootttthhhheeeerrrrssss ((((2222000011112222)))) 11110000 SSSSCCCCCCCC 333300003333, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in KKKKuuuullllwwwwiiiinnnnddddeeeerrrr SSSSiiiinnnngggghhhh aaaannnndddd ooootttthhhheeeerrrrssss VVVVssss.... SSSSttttaaaatttteeee ooooffff PPPPuuuunnnnjjjjaaaabbbb aaaannnndddd aaaannnnooootttthhhheeeerrrr,,,, 2222000000007777((((3333)))) RRRRCCCCRRRR ((((CCCCrrrriiiimmmmiiiinnnnaaaallll)))) 1111000055552222, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FFFFIIIIRRRR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. 7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. JJJJuuuullllyyyy 1111sssstttt,,,, 2222000022225555 ((((M M M MAAAANNNNJJJJAAAARRRRIIII NNNNEEEEHHHHRRRRUUUU KKKKAAAAUUUULLLL)))) Puneet JJJJUUUUDDDDGGGGEEEE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2025.07.01 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh