IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 207-II Brij Mohan Singh Ram Sarup CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Court) is 30.5.2001 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ambala, whereby the first appeal filed by the respondent (appellant before the first Appellate Court) representation on behalf of any of the parties and actual date of hearing notices were issued to the parties. 3704-2001 left the given address. The respondent has RSA-3705-2001 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.3705 Date of decision :-17.07.2025 Brij Mohan Singh Versus Sarup Pali CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellant. None for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellant (respondent before the first Appellate is in the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 30.5.2001 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ambala, whereby the first appeal filed by the respondent (appellant before the first Appellate Court) The matter pertains to the year As per last order dated 07.4.2025 there was no representation on behalf of any of the parties and actual date of hearing notices were issued to the parties. As per office report in the connected appeal i.e. RSA 2001, the appellant remain unserved with the report that left the given address. The respondent has 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.3705 of 2001 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellant …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA (respondent before the first Appellate in the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 30.5.2001 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ambala, whereby the first appeal filed by the respondent-Ram Sarup Pali (appellant before the first Appellate Court) has been allowed. ter pertains to the year 2001. As per last order dated 07.4.2025 there was no representation on behalf of any of the parties and actual date of hearing notices were issued to the parties. in the connected appeal i.e. RSA- , the appellant remain unserved with the report that he has left the given address. The respondent has also reported to be died. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.18 16.42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document appellant would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer pendency of the present than 24 years, the appellant ha no attempt has been made by a new counsel. the instant appeal is dismissed for non appellant, to move an appropriate application within a period of 0 months from today for reviving the same, if so, advised. July 17, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No RSA-3705-2001 (O & M) In the aforesaid premise, issuance of fresh notice to the appellant would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer pendency of the present appeal before this Court for a period of more years, the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the same, as no attempt has been made by him to contact a new counsel. Be that as it may, in view of the foregoing circumstances, the instant appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the , to move an appropriate application within a period of 0 months from today for reviving the same, if so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 In the aforesaid premise, issuance of fresh notice to the appellant would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long ppeal before this Court for a period of more lost interest in pursuing the same, as to contact his counsel or to engage iew of the foregoing circumstances, prosecution, with liberty to the , to move an appropriate application within a period of 02 months from today for reviving the same, if so, advised. application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.18 16.42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document