ANUJA D/O UDDHAVRAO PAUL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH POLICE INSPECTOR, PALUS POLICE STATION
APL/1354/2023 · 2025-07-30
Shri A S Gadkari, Shri Rajesh S Patil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42948 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42948 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Osk 21-Apl-1354-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (A.P.L.) NO. 1354 OF 2023 Anuja d/o. Uddhavrao Paul … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents _______________________________________ Mr. Nitin L. Dhobale for Applicant. Ms. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 30th July 2025.
P.C. : 1) It is an admitted fact on record that, the Applicant, though a qualified Doctor had not obtained permission from any Government Authority to run a Pathology Laboratory, by name Jadhav Laboratory. 1.1) Despite asking the learned Advocate for Applicant repeatedly, to show any document, even to remotely suggest that, the Applicant was lawfully permitted to conduct and run a Pathology Laboratory under any law, he was unable to produce the same. The only contention raised on behalf of the Applicant is that, he is MD (Pathology) and therefore entitled to do anything under the law. We are not in agreement with the learned Advocate for the Applicant on this submission. 1/2
Osk 21-Apl-1354-2023.doc 2) Perusal of First Information Report and other record clearly indicates that, a prima-facie case against the Applicant is made out. 3) Application is being dehors of merits is accordingly dismissed.
( RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) 2/2 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2025.08.01 17:34:42 +0530