IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 PUSHPINDER SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of official respondents and his family members action on their representation dated 30.01.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the v that the petitioner ha Senior Superintendent grievances as mentioned considered and no action has this stage, the petitioner would to respondent No. aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: PUSHPINDER SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members at the hands of respondent their representation dated 30.01.2025 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioner has recently filed a representation on Superintendent of Police, Pathankot (Annexure P mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.3435 of 2025 Date of decision: 07.04.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 & 5 and to take their representation dated 30.01.2025 (Annexure P-7). ery outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted recently filed a representation on 30.01.2025 before the Pathankot (Annexure P-7) raising his ion but the same has not yet been been taken thereon. He further submitted that at satisfied if appropriate directions are issued of Police, Pathankot to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action of the the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner take submitted before the his ion but the same has not yet been further submitted that at satisfied if appropriate directions are issued decide the necessary action Jyoti 2025.04.07 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.3435 of 2025 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to her 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, th of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of one month from with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the family members security in order to protect their life and liberty 07.04.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.3435 of 2025 Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, th of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 30.01.2025 (Annexure P one month from today, by passing a speaking order in with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the family members, the official respondents would provide security in order to protect their life and liberty. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.3435 of 2025 -2- Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-7) of the petitioner within a today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioner as well as his , the official respondents would provide them adequate . (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in Court, has the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without disposed the aforesaid of the petitioner within a accordance as well as his them adequate Jyoti 2025.04.07 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document