Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42946 (AP)

Suryadevara Kanna Jashuva v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/3182/2018 · 2025-12-09

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010857932018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3182/2018 Between: 1. SURYADEVARA KANNA JASHUVA, CHRISTIAN,EMPLOYEE, HYNY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, R/O GANDHI NAGAR, CHILAKALAPUDI POST, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SURYADEVARA NISSY JOYES, MOTHERS PROTECTION, C/O N. CHANDRASEKHARA RAO, RIO D.NO. 34-4-16B, KASTURIBAIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SURYADEVARA ANOOP JASHUVA, C/O N. CHANDRASEKHARA RAO, R/O D.NO. 34-4-16B, KASTURIBAIPET, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA- DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 O R D E R 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioner/respondent under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the order dated 29.03.2018 passed in M.C.No.51 of 2012 on the file of the learned Judge, Principal Family Court-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner/respondent submits that consequent to the subsequent development, no orders are required in this revision case. 4. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is “dismissed as infructuous”. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 10.12.2025 SR 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.3182 of 2018 Date: 10.12.2025 SR