NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. ASHOK KUMAR GARG AND OTHERS
CR/2545/2024 · 2025-01-14
Lapita Banerji
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42941 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42941 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE
111
1.
2. CR-2546
CORAM : HO
Present : Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Ms.
Mr
LAPITA BANE
Th
2.
Le that even thoug money is lying August 22, 202 account of the PIU, Ludhian
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A
CHANDIGARH
DATE OF DECISION : JAN
Versus
46-2024(O&M)
!
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPIT Mr. K.S. Kang, Advocate for the pe Mr. Amit Jhanji, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mandeep Nagpal, Advocate, Mr. Sahil Ahelawat, Advocate and Ms. Kurjuit Kaur Sara, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Madan, Advocate for respo NERJI, J.(ORAL) This order will dispose of CR-2545
Learned counsel appearing on beh though, petitioner is not the judgm lying attached with the executing C 2, 2024, a Coordinate Bench of this C the petitioner-National Highways udhiana Expressway bearing
AB AND HARYANA AT
JANUARY 14, 2025 …PETITIONER
…RESPONDENTS
"#$
"$
APITA BANERJI the petitioner. with and ate for respondent No.1. r respondent No.2. 2545-2024 and CR-2546-2024. on behalf of the petitioner submits
judgment/award debtor, still its ting Court. Vide the order dated f this Court had directed the bank s Authority of India (NHAI) ing No.201004109168 IFSC PRINCE SAINI 2025.01.14 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
No.INDB00000 account, it was account lay de attachment did n
3.
Thi perused the mate
4.
Up sum of Rs.66,13 (EXE/1144/201 Similarly, a su petitioner in CR of the decretal am
5.
It EXE/1144/2019 disputes betwee executing Court.
6.
Wi are disposed of.
7.
Pen
8.
A p
JANUARY 14, Prince
Whether speaking/ Whether reportable
0000098 to be de-attached. Upon was found that the entirety of th ay deposited with the executing C t did not serve any practical purpose f This Court has heard the learned e material on record. Upon consideration of the facts, thi s.66,13,30,105/- should be released to th 4/2019) being an amount held in exc a sum of Rs.14,68,38,373/- is dire in CR-2545-2024 (EXE/1143/2019) be retal amount. It is made clear that a sum /2019 is to remain attached with the ex etween the parties are not resolved Court. With the aforesaid directions, CR- sed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall a A photocopy of this order be placed Y 14, 2025
aking/reasoned :
Yes/No ortable :
Yes/No
pon de-attachment of the said of the money lying in the said ing Court and the order of de- pose for the petitioner concerned. arned counsel for the parties and cts, this Court is of the view that a d to the petitioner in CR-2546-2024 in excess of the decretal amount. s directed to be released to the ) being an amount held in excess sum of Rs.1,04,16,425/- in the executing Court till the inter se lved or till further orders by the -2545-2024 and CR-2546-2024 shall also stand disposed of. laced on the file of connected case.
(LAPITA BANERJI)
JUDGE
PRINCE SAINI 2025.01.14 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment