1 2025:CGHC:48489-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 700 of 2025 1 - L.P. Patel (Laxmi Prasad Patel ) S/o Shri Ishwar Prasad Patel, Aged About 59 Years Working As A In-Charge District Education Officer, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Education, Chhattisgarh, Of School Government Of Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director, Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector, Sarangarh Bilaigarh, Distt. Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - In-Charge, District Education Officer Raigarh (C.G.) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.09.22 18:20:30 +0530 2 5 - Smt. Vaibhawari Singh Thakur, Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Hardi, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.) 6 - Shri Joddha Ram Dahriya, Presently Posted As In-Charge District Education Officer, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Appellant : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate along with Shri Dhani Ram Patel, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Shri S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate. For Intervener/Caveator : Ms. Komal Yadav, Advocate on behalf of Shri Siddharth Pandey, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 22.09.2025 1. The present writ appeal has been filed with the following prayer:- “ It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this appeal and set aside the order dated 10.07.2025 passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge in Writ petition (S) No. 6537 of 2025 and the consequential transfer 3 order dated 10.07.2025 and consequently allowed the writ petition of the appellant in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant’s suspension has already been revoked by the authority concerned on the ground that the charge sheet could not be filed within the stipulated period i.e. 90 days. 3. In view of the same, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. The appellant/writ petitioner, if aggrieved, by any further action of the respondents, he is at liberty to take recourse to law. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous with the liberty as stated supra. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Shoaib