Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4294 (AP)

ANNAM SRINIVASA RAO v. THE STATE OF A.P., & ANOTHER

CRLRC/1372/2014 · 2025-07-31

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010030242014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1372/2014 Between: 1. ANNAM SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.VEERASWAMI, OCC:PVT., EMPLOYEE, R/O.DOOR NO.39-8-9/3, VARMA COMPLEX, MURALI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A.P, REP, BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. 2. ANNAM ARUNA KUMARI, W/O. SRINIVASA RAO, D/O. BALLA VENUGOPALA RAO, R/O.BALLA VEEDHI BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the order in Crl.RP.NO.41 of 2012 on the file of Special Judge for Trial of offences under SCs & STs (POA) Act-cum-Addl. District and Session Judge, Vizianagaram dt.04.04.2014. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 2222 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in MC.No.34 of 2009 on the file of Additional Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class Bobbili, Vizianagaram District pending disposal of the above Crl.RC. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M PREMNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.1372 of 2014 ORDER: Report received from the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Vizianagaram, dated 25.07.2025. As per the report, the petitioner appeared before them and submitted written intimation dated 25.07.2025 stating that the petitioner/husband and respondent No.2/wife filed mutual divorce petition in F.C.O.P.No.1159 of 2010 and they got granted decree of divorce by mutual consent on 14.12.2010. Since then, they have been residing separately from the past 15 years. 2. It is further submitted that the petitioner and respondent No.2 have settled the dispute in Crl.M.P.No.3265 of 2014 in M.C.No.34 of 2009 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bobbili on 20.08.2014 and copy of the award is also submitted to that effect. 3. It seems that the parties have settled the matter and award is also passed and even otherwise, the petitioner is not showing interest, to prosecute the matter. 4. In the said facts of the case, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non prosecution. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 01.08.2025 M K K