BHARAT SINGH S/O JAGDISH SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16077/2025 · 2025-12-06
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42937 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42937 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49772] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 16077/2025 Bharat Singh S/o Jagdish Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 3, Village Ajitgarh, Police Station Ajitgarh, Tehsil Shri Madhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (At Present In Sub Jail, Neem Ka Thana). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 06/12/2025
1. The present 2nd bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Bharat Singh S/o Jagdish Singh seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.230/2025 dated 25.06.2025 registered at P.S. Ajitgarh, District Sikar, for the offence under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time.
[2025:RJ-JP:49772] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16077/2025]
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that first bail application was dismissed on 03.09.2025. Currently, the petitioner is in custody and only one statement is recorded by the trial Court.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.
6. On basis of interception and recovery on 25.06.2025, FIR No.230/2025 was registered at P.S. Ajitgarh District Sikar under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. Though, there was a recovery of 8.7 gms of smack (Heroin) which is more than small quantity but less than commercial quantity but two more criminal cases under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act were registered against same petitioner in last two years. It indicate that the petitioner is regularly involved in these type of matters.
7. The facts and the material indicate that the alleged offence are of serious nature and role attributed to applicant is prima facie sufficient to consider complicity of applicant in the crime. Therefore, at this juncture, considering the evidence collected so far, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant accused on bail.
[2025:RJ-JP:49772] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16077/2025]
8. Considering the gravity of allegations and overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to dismiss the bail application of the applicant accused at this stage.
9. Accordingly, the second application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by petitioner Bharat Singh is hereby dismissed.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/3