` CWP-9783-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CWP-9783-2025 Date of Decision: 08.09.2025 Raghubir Singh and others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Rajat Mor, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of order dated 04.09.2024 whereby claim of the petitioners has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia submits that petitioners retired one day prior to the date of accrual of increment. Their case is not at par with those employees who completed six months and claimed next increment. Their case is squarely covered by judgment dated 24.04.2025 passed by Division Bench of this Court in bunch of petitions including CWP No.14627 of 2024, Mahabir Singh Tanwar v. State of Haryana and others and order dated 06.08.2025 in CWP No.19519 of 2025, Raghubir Singh Dahiya and others v. State of Haryana and others. 3. Faced with this, learned State counsel expressed his inability to controvert applicability of aforesaid judgments to the facts of instant case. MOHIT KUMAR 2025.09.08 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. ` CWP-9783-2025 -2- 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of in terms of order dated 06.08.2025 passed by Division Bench of this Court in Raghubir Singh Dahiya (supra). (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 08.09.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.09.08 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.