Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42925 (PNJ)

ARJAN SINGH v. F.C.I. & ORS.

CWP/3404/2002 · 2025-05-22

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

214.1 ARJAN SINGH FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) touch with the petitioner and does not know as to whether, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy or not. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case, the petitioner intends to pursue the present remedy. 22-05-2025 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3404 Date of Decision : 22 ARJAN SINGH VERSUS FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. G.S Bal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.K Gupta, Advocate for the respondent-FCI. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner touch with the petitioner and does not know as to whether, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy or not. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case, the petitioner intends to pursue the present Ordered accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3404-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision : 22-05-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS AND ORS. ........Respondent(s) JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. G.S Bal, Sr. Advocate with HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not in touch with the petitioner and does not know as to whether, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy or not. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case, the petitioner intends to pursue the present Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO ........Petitioner ........Respondent(s) JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI submits that he is not in touch with the petitioner and does not know as to whether, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy or not. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case, the petitioner intends to pursue the present (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.23 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document