Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42924 (KAR)

M/S INFINITY INFRA PROJECTS v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/58501/2016 · 2025-09-02

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34500 WP No. 58501 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 58501 OF 2016 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: M/S. INFINITY INFRA PROJECTS C/O. DIVYA VASU REDDY NO.129/4, U L LAB BUILDING, KALYANI PLATINA CAMPUS, EPIP ZONE, KUNDALAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 037 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETRIX SMT. DIVYA VASU REDDY W/O. SRI. C. VASU REDDY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SMT. VIJETHA R NAIK AND SRI. PRAMOD M, ADVOCATES (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY DEPT. OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER 3. THE SECRETARY-1 THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34500 WP No. 58501 of 2016 EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA KUMAR M., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. H.L.PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LETTER/FINAL NOTICE DATED 06.10.2016 BEARING NO.KIADB/HO/ALLOT/SECY/21088/10101/2016-17 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31