Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42920 (CHH)

HARISHANKAR NIRMALKAR (IN PERSON) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10674/2025 · 2025-09-09

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:46075 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10674 of 2025 Harishankar Nirmalkar (In Person) S/o Punaram Nirmalkar Aged About 65 Years (Retired Employee Astt. Fetter, E And M Claiming Leave Enchashment For Himself) R/o Murum Khadan Mohalla, Village- Khamtarai Baima, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Water Resource, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Secretary Department Of General Administration Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Secretary Department Of Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Engineer-In Chief Water Resource Department, Shivnath Bhawan, Sector- 19 Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Engineer Water Resource Division, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Superintendent Engineer E And M Water Resource Circle, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Executive Engineer E And M Heavy Machinary Division Water Resource Department Sakari, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Petitioner in person For Respondents/State : Shri S Choubey, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 10.09.2025 1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in the case of Faguvaram Patel, and others Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others (WPS-3870 of 2021), decided on 30.09.2022. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.09.11 10:38:58 +0530 Wps 10674 of 2025 2 2. In view of above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 4. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE padma