Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42917 (KAR)

NARAYANASWAMY v. KEMPAIAH

CRP/615/2018 · 2025-10-14

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40605 CRP No. 615 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 615 OF 2018 BETWEEN: NARAYANASWAMY SON OF LATE DODDAVALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT KATTUGOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDERAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK MANDUR POST BENGALURU - 560 049. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURESH DESAI K.,ADVOCATE) AND: KEMPAIAH SON OF LATE NARASHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 110. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. Y.P. VIJAYA VASANTHA KUMARI.,ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED U/S.115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.10.2018 PASSED ON IA IN OS.NO.528/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40605 CRP No. 615 of 2018 BANGALORE (RURAL), BANGALORE DISMISSING THE IA FILED U/O 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as under: " The counsel for the petitioner herewith submits the above said petition had become infructuous, the petition has filed based on the partition suit bearing number 528/2000 on the file of the senior civil judge Bangalore Rural, which was decreed on 23/04/2021, in the event of the same the above petition has become infructuous, the counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the same in the interest of justice and equity.'' Placing the memo on record, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68