JAGDEEP SACHDEVA SON OF LATE SHRI CHETAN DAS SACHDEVA v. KRISHNA KUMAR ARORA (DECEASED) SON OF LATE SHRI DEENANATH JI ARORA
CW/19225/2025 · 2025-12-08
Bipin Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42912 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42912 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49872] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19225/2025
1. Jagdeep Sachdeva Son Of Late Shri Chetan Das Sachdeva, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Flat No.90, Manzil Apartment, Dwarka Sector-9, New Delhi-110077
2. Smt. Shasil Khaneja W/o. Shri Ajay Kumar Khaneja, D/o. Late Shri Chetan Das Sachdeva, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Flat No.89, Vidya Sagar Apartment, Sector-6, Dwarka New Delhi-110077
3. Smt. Renu Taneja W/o. Shri Ashok Taneja D/o. Late Shri Chetan Das Sachdeva, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of C-139, Pocket-1, Sector-82, Central Vihar Second, Noida Up-201304. All Through Power Of Attorney Holder Rajesh Sachdeva S/o. Late Shri Chetandas Sachdeva, Aged About 59 Years, Residents Of C-185-186, West Patel Na- gar, New Delhi (Earlier Resident At Aforesaid Address Now Residing At F-67, Green Woods City, Sector-46, Guru Gram, Haryana. ----Petitioners Versus
1. 1/1. 1/2. Krishna Kumar Arora (Deceased) Son Of Late Shri Deenanath Ji Arora, Resident Of 11/258, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Dinesh Arora, Aged About 30 Years, Son Of Late Shri Krishna Kumar Jitendra Arora (Deceased), Aged About 27 Years, Son Of Late Shri Krishna Kumar
2. 2/1. 2/2. Darshan Kumar Arora Son Of Late Shri Deenanath Ji Arora, Resident Of Quarter No. 394, Gurunanakpura, Dhruv Marg, Jaipur (Deceased During The Pendency Of The Suit) Through His Legal Heirs: Tarun Son Of Late Darshan Kumar Arora, Resident Of Quarter No. 394, Gurunanakpura, Dhruv Marg, Jaipur Manali Daughter Of Late Darshan Kumar Arora, Resident Of Quarter No. 394, Gurunanakpura, Dhruv Marg, Jaipur
3. Smt. Pushpalata Wife Of Chetandas Sachdeva, Resident Of C-185-186, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi (Deceased During The Pendency Of The Suit) (suit abated)
4. Smt. Ramesh Arora S/o. Late Deenanath Ji, (Wrongly
[2025:RJ-JP:49872] (2 of 3) [CW-19225/2025] Mentioned As Son Of It Out To Be Daughter Of) Resident Of Quarter No.394, Gurunanakpura, Dhurv Marg, Jaipur
5. 5/1. Smt. Harish Kanta Wife Of Satish Kumar, Resident Of Quarter No. 5, Gurunanakpura, Jaipur (Deceased During The Pendency Of The Suit) Through Her Legal Heir: Suman Sikri Wife Of Satish Kumar, Resident Of Quarter No. 51-A, Gurunanakpura, Rajapark, Jaipur. 6. 6/1. 6/2.
Smt. Rita Rani Wife Of Shri Lalchand Ahuja, Resident Of A-225, Rajapark, Gali No. 1, In Front Of Hans Palace, Jaipur (Deceased During The Pendency Of The Suit) Through Her Legal Heirs: Sharad Son Of Shri Lalchand, Residents Of A-225, Ra- japark, Gali No. 1, In Front Of Hans Palace, Jaipur Charu Rani Daughter Of Shri Lalchand, Residents Of A- 225, Rajapark, Gali No. 1, In Front Of Hans Palace, Jaipur
7. Sant Ramdas Son Of Shri Gopaldas, Shop No. 6, Gandhi Market, Purohit Ji Ka Katla, Johri Bazaar, Jaipur
8. 8/1. 8/2. 8/3. Sushma Arora Wife Of Shri Surendra Arora, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 2/579, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Rohit Son Of Shri Surendra Arora, Resident Of 8/37, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Minakshi Daughter Of Shri Surendra Arora, Resident Of 8/37, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Surendra Arora, Resident Of 8/37, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Jain, Adv. with Mr. Amit Soni, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Order 08/12/2025 With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is decided in the following terms:
[2025:RJ-JP:49872] (3 of 3) [CW-19225/2025] (i) The order dated 07.11.2025, insofar as it dismissed the peti- tioners application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, is quashed and set aside. (ii) The petitioners are allowed to be impleaded as a legal repre- sentative of the deceased Smt. Pushpalata in the suit. (iii) The petitioners will not file any reply or new pleadings. Peti- tioners may participate in the suit only from the current stage. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-120