Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42911 (CHH)

VIRENDRA KUMAR VAISHNAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/7180/2025 · 2025-09-08

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45807 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7180 of 2025 Virendra Kumar Vaishnav S/o Omdatta Vaishnav, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village - Tamnar, Thana - Tamnar, District - Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. … Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station - Tamnar, District - Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mukta Tripathi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 09/09/2025 1. Heard. 2. This is the second application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sahinta, 2023, for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.153/2022 registered at Police Station -Tamnar District Raigarh for the offence punishable under Sections SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY DN: cn=SHYNA AJAY, o=PERSONAL, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN 2 365, 366, 342, 506, 323, 376(n), 34 of the IPC. 3. The earlier bail application of the applicant was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 3.10.2024 passed in MCRC No.6828 of 2024 with liberty to the applicant to repeat the prayer after examination of the prosecutrix/victim. 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that this bail application may be disposed of reserving a liberty in favour of the applicant to file a repeat bail application, if the prosecutrix is not examined within a stipulated period. He also prays for a direction to the concerned trial Court to expedite the trial. 5. Learned counsel for the State would not oppose the aforesaid prayer. She submits that the earlier bail application was withdrawn with liberty to repeat the prayer after examination of the prosecutrix, but till so far, the prosecutrix has not been examined as one of the accused is absconding. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to repeat the prayer if the prosecutrix is not examined within four months from the date of of this order. Furthermore, the applicant is also directed to file a certified copy of this order before the concerned trial Court, bringing it to its notice. In turn, the trial Court is directed to take appropriate steps to ensure the prompt examination of the prosecutrix and other witnesses. 7. The bail application stands disposed of. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Shyna