Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42910 (RAJ)

RAJESH KUMAR S/O SHRI KANHAIYA LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17138/2025 · 2025-11-18

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48396] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17138/2025 Rajesh Kumar S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Near Neem Bari Gate, Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Home Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. The Inspector General Of Police, Kota Range, Kota (Rajasthan). 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been preferred with following prayer; I. The respondents be directed to consider the candidature of the Petitioner for promotion on the post of Head Constable against the vacancy year 2013-2014 and further the respondents be directed to give promotion to the Petitioner on the post of Head Constable against the vacancy year 2013-2014 by conducting review DPC and also directed to allow the petitioner to participate in Departmental promotion examination for promotion on the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector pursuant to calender of conducting Departmental examination of Kota Range dated 19.02.2025 and give him promotion on the post of Assistant Sub- [2025:RJ-JP:48396] (2 of 2) [CW-17138/2025] Inspector from the due date with all consequential benefits; 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /89