CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----18921 18921 18921 18921---- 111+239 111+239 111+239 111+239 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Suresh State of Haryana CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: Present: Present: Present: Present:- SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL 1. Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) the petitioner in case bearing FIR No offences punishable under Section Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’ deleted and Sections 109(1), 118(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 added later on) Police Station 2. complainant, namely, of his sister-in The complainant objected hot words with him. 14.07.2024, at about 8:30 AM, s/o Dharma, Kalu s/o Randhir, Sunil and Bholu ----2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: versus Haryana HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Ankit Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana. ***** ***** ***** ***** SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.196 dated ences punishable under Sections 110, 115, 190 and 191(3) Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) (Sec deleted and Sections 109(1), 118(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 added later on) Police Station Barauda, District Sonipat. The gravamen of the allegations against the petitioner is that , namely, Neeraj alleged that the petitioner in-law, due-to-which, their image in society omplainant objected to the same, due to hot words with him. It has been alleged that in 14.07.2024, at about 8:30 AM, the petitioner, Anbil s/o Rajbir, Pillu @ Jitender s/o Dharma, Kalu s/o Randhir, Sunil and Bholu 1111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----18921 18921 18921 18921----2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: August 12 August 12 August 12 August 12, 2025 , 2025 , 2025 , 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL for the petitioner. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to dated 15.07.2024, registered for the 110, 115, 190 and 191(3) of the Bharatiya (Sections 190 and 191(3) of BNS deleted and Sections 109(1), 118(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 added later on), at The gravamen of the allegations against the petitioner is that the petitioner used to visit the house which, their image in society was being tarnished. to which, the petitioner exchanged has been alleged that in order to take revenge, on , Anbil s/o Rajbir, Pillu @ Jitender s/o Dharma, Kalu s/o Randhir, Sunil and Bholu, while hatching a conspiracy, 1111 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) , 2025 , 2025 , 2025 , 2025 Petitioner ….Respondent 483 of the Bharatiya for grant of regular bail to registered for the Bharatiya tions 190 and 191(3) of BNS at The gravamen of the allegations against the petitioner is that house being tarnished. exchanged order to take revenge, on , Anbil s/o Rajbir, Pillu @ Jitender , MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.12 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----18921 18921 18921 18921---- attacked the complaint with When the complainant's brother Nasib came to rescue hi attacked him as well 3. has been falsely implicated into the FIR in question argued that the petitioner is in custody since iterated that case the order dated 09.07.202 has been registered against the present FIR/ complainant’s side. Learned counsel further iterated that both the injured, namely, Nasib been examined and thus, there is no likelihood of the petitioner the substantial 4. that the allegations raised he does not deserve the concession of the regular bail seeks to place on record custody certificate dated taken on record. 5. the available records of the case. 6. investigation was carried out and the challan was presented on Total 15 prosecution witnesses have been cited examined till date The rival contentions raised at Bar give ----2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) attacked the complaint with axe and farsa. They inflicted injuries on his head. complainant's brother Nasib came to rescue hi attacked him as well. They all pushed the complainant's mother. Learned counsel for the petitioner has has been falsely implicated into the FIR in question the petitioner is in custody since case in hand is one of version and cross the order dated 09.07.2025 passed by learned JMIC, Gohana, Sonipat has been registered against the present FIR/ complainant’s side. Learned counsel further iterated that both the injured, namely, Nasib been examined and thus, there is no likelihood of the petitioner substantial prosecution evidence. Thus, regular bail is prayed for. Learned State counsel has opposed the present petition that the allegations raised against the petitioner does not deserve the concession of the regular bail seeks to place on record custody certificate dated on record. I have heard counsel for the rival the available records of the case. The present petitioner was arrested on investigation was carried out and the challan was presented on prosecution witnesses have been cited till date. It is thus, indubitable that conclusion of trial will take long. contentions raised at Bar give shall be 2222 . They inflicted injuries on his head. complainant's brother Nasib came to rescue him, then, they all . They all pushed the complainant's mother. Learned counsel for the petitioner has iterated that the petitioner has been falsely implicated into the FIR in question. Learned counsel further the petitioner is in custody since 16.07.2024. Learned counsel of version and cross-version and, pursuant to passed by learned JMIC, Gohana, Sonipat, an FIR has been registered against the present FIR/ complainant’s side. Learned counsel further iterated that both the injured, namely, Nasib and Neeraj have been examined and thus, there is no likelihood of the petitioner interfering with Thus, regular bail is prayed for. Learned State counsel has opposed the present petition by arguing against the petitioner are serious in nature and, thus, does not deserve the concession of the regular bail. Learned State counsel seeks to place on record custody certificate dated 11.08.2025 in Court, which is rival parties and have gone through arrested on 16.07.2024, whereinafter, investigation was carried out and the challan was presented on 11.09.2024. prosecution witnesses have been cited, but only 02 have been , indubitable that conclusion of trial will take long. shall be gone into during course of the 2222 . They inflicted injuries on his head. m, then, they all that the petitioner Learned counsel further . Learned counsel version and, pursuant to , an FIR has been registered against the present FIR/ complainant’s side. Learned Neeraj have interfering with arguing , Learned State counsel 2025 in Court, which is parties and have gone through whereinafter, . been , indubitable that conclusion of trial will take long. the MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.12 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----18921 18921 18921 18921---- trial. This Court does not deem it appropriate to delve deep into these rival contentions, at this stage, lest it may prejudice the trial. Nothing tangible has been brought forward to indicate the likelihood of the petitioner absconding from the process of justic 6.1. State counsel, the petitioner has already suffered incarceration for a period of 01 year & 26 not warranted in the facts 7. ordered to be released on regular b satisfaction of the Ld. to conditions that may be imposed by the concerned petitioner shall remain bound by the following 8. which may be imposed by ----2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) This Court does not deem it appropriate to delve deep into these rival contentions, at this stage, lest it may prejudice the trial. Nothing tangible has been brought forward to indicate the likelihood of the petitioner absconding from the process of justice or interfering with the prosecution evidence. As per custody certificate dated State counsel, the petitioner has already suffered incarceration for a period of 26 days, & is not shown to be involved in any Suffice to say, further detention of the petitioner as an undertrial is not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. In view of above, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Ld. Concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the concerned petitioner shall remain bound by the following (i) The petitioner shall not mis (ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence, oral or documentary, during the trial. (iii) The petitioner shall not absent himself on any date before the trial. (iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. (v) The petitioner shall deposit his passport, if any, with the trial Court. (vi) The petitioner shall give his cellphone number to the Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and shall not change his cell permission of the CJM/ Duty (vii) The petitioner shall not in any manner try to delay the trial. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those which may be imposed by concerned CJM 3333 This Court does not deem it appropriate to delve deep into these rival contentions, at this stage, lest it may prejudice the trial. Nothing tangible has been brought forward to indicate the likelihood of the petitioner absconding e or interfering with the prosecution evidence. As per custody certificate dated 11.08.2025 filed by the learned State counsel, the petitioner has already suffered incarceration for a period of , & is not shown to be involved in any other case/ FIR. Suffice to say, further detention of the petitioner as an undertrial is and circumstances of the case. In view of above, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is ail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the /Duty Magistrate. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the concerned CJM /Duty Magistrate, the petitioner shall remain bound by the following conditions: The petitioner shall not mis-use the liberty granted. The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence, oral or documentary, during the trial. The petitioner shall not absent himself on any date before The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. The petitioner shall deposit his passport, if any, with the The petitioner shall give his cellphone number to the Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and shall not change his cell-phone number without prior CJM/ Duty Magistrate. The petitioner shall not in any manner try to delay the trial. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those CJM/ Duty Magistrate as directed 3333 This Court does not deem it appropriate to delve deep into these rival contentions, at this stage, lest it may prejudice the trial. Nothing tangible has been brought forward to indicate the likelihood of the petitioner absconding .08.2025 filed by the learned State counsel, the petitioner has already suffered incarceration for a period of Suffice to say, further detention of the petitioner as an undertrial is In view of above, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is ail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the /Duty Magistrate. However, in addition /Duty Magistrate, the The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence, oral or The petitioner shall not absent himself on any date before The petitioner shall deposit his passport, if any, with the The petitioner shall give his cellphone number to the Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and phone number without prior In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those Duty Magistrate as directed MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.12 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----18921 18921 18921 18921---- hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant shall be at liberty to move cancellation of bail of the petitioner. 9. 10. opinion on the merits of the case. 11. application, if any, shall also stands disposed off. August 12 August 12 August 12 August 12, , , , 2025 2025 2025 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: ----2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) 2025 (O&M) hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant shall be at liberty to move cancellation of bail of the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. Nothing said hereinabove shall be opinion on the merits of the case. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off. 2025 2025 2025 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No 4444 hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant shall be at liberty to move cancellation of bail of the petitioner. Nothing said hereinabove shall be construed as an expression of Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off. ((((SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL)))) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE 4444 hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant construed as an expression of Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.12 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment