Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 101
Ashok Kumar
Nanak Singh, IPS, Senior
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
order dated 18.7.2022 (Annexure P 4644-2021 titled as “Ashok Kumar and another vs. State of Punjab and others”, directing to the respondents “ perception to the petitioners and a respondent No.2 shall take appropriate action in accordance with law”, has not been complied with.
that vide order dated 05.12.2022 passed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, it has been noted that “ got recorded their statement before ASI Harjinder Singh of Police Station City Gurdaspur that they COCP-1717-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1717 of 2025
Date of decision : Ashok Kumar Versus Nanak Singh, IPS, Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
The present contempt petition has
order dated 18.7.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court in CRWP 2021 titled as “Ashok Kumar and another vs. State of Punjab and others”, directing to the respondents “ perception to the petitioners and after considering the same, respondent No.2 shall take appropriate action in accordance with ”, has not been complied with. At the very outset, learned counsel for the State submits that vide order dated 05.12.2022 passed by the Senior Superintendent f Police, Gurdaspur, it has been noted that “ got recorded their statement before ASI Harjinder Singh of Police Station City Gurdaspur that they do not require any police protection,
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1717 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-05.04.2025 …..Petitioner Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Deepak Arora, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. The present contempt petition has been filed stating that 1) passed by this Court in CRWP- 2021 titled as “Ashok Kumar and another vs. State of Punjab and others”, directing to the respondents “….to assess the threat fter considering the same, respondent No.2 shall take appropriate action in accordance with At the very outset, learned counsel for the State submits that vide order dated 05.12.2022 passed by the Senior Superintendent f Police, Gurdaspur, it has been noted that “…the petitioners have got recorded their statement before ASI Harjinder Singh of Police do not require any police protection, VIJAY ASIJA 2025.04.08 17.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
but they have been directed to approach the concerne Superintendent of Police/Police Station whenever they apprehend any such threat and accordingly the DSP/Police Station have been issued directions.” taken on record. passed and the present petition stands
April 05, 202 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
COCP-1717-2025 (O & M) but they have been directed to approach the concerne Superintendent of Police/Police Station whenever they apprehend any such threat and accordingly the DSP/Police Station have been issued directions.” Copy of this order is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed and the present petition stands disposed of
Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
, 2025
speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 but they have been directed to approach the concerned Deputy Superintendent of Police/Police Station whenever they apprehend any such threat and accordingly the DSP/Police Station have been issued Copy of this order is handed over in the Court, which is no further orders are required to be
disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.04.08 17.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document