Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:19609
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP(227) No. 906 of 2019 • Sharda Mandal S/o Haren Mandal Aged About 58 Years R/o Village- Silfilli, Police Station- Jainagar, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus
1. Anil Mandal S/o Late Kedar Mandal Aged About 62 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Occupation- Agriculture, Police Station- Jainagar, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh
2. Sanyasi Mandal Late Kedar Mandal Aged About 58 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Occupation- Agriculture, Police Station- Jainagar, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh
3. Govind Mandal S/o Late Kedar Mandal Aged About 54 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Occupation- Agriculture, Police Station- Jainagar, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh
4. Sadan Mandal S/o Govind Mandal Aged About 30 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Occupation- Agriculture, Police Station- Jainagar, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh
5. Anjana Mandal W/o Govind Mandal Aged About 52 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Occupation- Housewife, Police Station- Jainagar, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh
6. Panchnam Mandal S/o Sanyasi Mandal Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Occupation- Agriculture, Police Station- Jainagar, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh
7. Deepak Mandal Sanyasi Mandal Aged About 26 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Occupation- Agriculture, Police Station- Jainagar, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh
8. Unkonwn W/o Deepak Mandal Aged About 30 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Occupation- Housewife, Police Station- Jainagar, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Gyan Prakash Shukla, Advocate For Respondents No. 3 & 5 : Ms. Priyanka Mehta, Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 30/04/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
“10.1 This Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to set- aside the order passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Surajpur, District – Surajpur dated 21.08.2019 (Annexure P/1) and pass a direction to hear the miscellaneous appeal under Order 43 Rule1(r) on merits and decide the same within the time as per the law. 10.2 Any other relief, which is deemed fit and proper may also be awarded to the Petitioner.”
2. Mr. Gyan Prakash Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instruction.
3. Accordingly, the petitioner is dismissed. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
JUDGE vatti