Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4289 (KAR)

SMT LAXMI W/O HANAMANT BIDRI v. SHRI SIDDALING RAMAPPA CHOUGALA ALIAS NOOLI

MFA/101395/2024 · 2025-02-06

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SNJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101395 OF 2024 (MV) BETWEEN: 1 . SMT LAXMI W/O HANAMANT BIDRI AGE 26 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O NANDIKURALI, TQ RAIBAG, DIST BELAGAVI 591317 2 . KUMAR HARSHAVARDHAN S/O HANAMANT BIDRI AGE 6 YEARS, OCC NIL APPELLANT NO 2, IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL MOTHER NEXT FRIEND -APPELLANT NO .1 R/O NANDIKURALI, TQ RAIBAG, DIST BELAGAVI 591317 3 . SRI BHIMA S/O MARUTI BIDRI AGE 56 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE R/O NANDIKURALI, TQ RAIBAG, DIST BELAGAVI 591317 4 . SMT SHOBHA W/O BHIMA BISRI AGE 49 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O NANDIKURALI, TQ RAIBAG, DIST BELAGAVI 591317 ... APPELLANT (By SRI. SANGAMESH S GHULAPPANAVAR) 2 AND 1 . SHRI SIDDALING RAMAPPA CHOUGALA @ NOOLI AGE 49 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS R/O MARADI , TQ RAIBAG, DIST BELAGAVI 591317 OWNER OF TRACTOR NO.KA-49/T-8647 2 . SHRI BHARAMANAND S/O SIDLING CHOUGALA AGE 29 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESDS R/O MARADI , TQ RAIBAG, DIST BELAGAVI 591317 OWNER OF TRAILER NO KA-23/TB-3671/KA-23/TB-3670 3 . THE BRANCH MANAGER THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD NO 4576 PHARALE BUILDING K C ROAD NEAR PRABHAKAR TALKIES A/P CHIKODI DIST BELAGAVI 4 . THE BRANCH MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD NIPPANI BRANCH MAHAVEER CHAMABERS ASHOK NAGAR NIPPANI , DIST BELAGAVI 591 237 ... RESPONDENTS * * * * * This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 passed in MVC No.263/2020 on the file of The Senior Civil Judge & Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, At Raibag. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; 3 O R D E R Finally four weeks time is granted for compromise of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 26.03.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 101395 of 2024 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 06.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: vg C By: