APHC010201102024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: 1. JAN SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN,, GUNTUR, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, VEMANA KUPPU SWAMY, S/O VENKATA RAMANA RAO, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. JAGARLAMUDI NARENDRANATH BUILDING, JKC COLLEGE CAMPUS, GUJJANAGUNDIA, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 1. MR ATUI KUMAR TIWARI, PRESENTLY WORKING AS SECRETARY TO UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY FOR SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, ROOM NO.524, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAVAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI. 2. MR PREETHAM DATTA, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ADDI DIRECTOR, THE DIRECTORATE OF JAN SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN, 10/4, JAM NAGAR HOUSE, SHAHJAHAN ROAD, NEW DELHI. 3. MR B S KOTHARI, PRESENTLY WORKING AS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, JSS DIVIS BUILDING, SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI. Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be plea IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2338/2024 JAN SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN,, GUNTUR, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, VEMANA KUPPU SWAMY, S/O VENKATA RAMANA RAO, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. JAGARLAMUDI NARENDRANATH BUILDING, JKC COLLEGE CAMPUS, GUJJANAGUNDIA, GUNTUR, ANDHRA ...PETITIONER AND MR ATUI KUMAR TIWARI, PRESENTLY WORKING AS SECRETARY TO UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY FOR SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, ROOM NO.524, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAVAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI. MR PREETHAM DATTA, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ADDI DIRECTOR, THE DIRECTORATE OF JAN SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN, 10/4, JAM NAGAR HOUSE, SHAHJAHAN ROAD, NEW DELHI. MR B S KOTHARI, PRESENTLY WORKING AS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, JSS DIVISION, ROOM NO.203, PTI BUILDING, SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents for their wilful, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI JAN SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN,, GUNTUR, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, VEMANA KUPPU SWAMY, S/O VENKATA RAMANA RAO, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. JAGARLAMUDI NARENDRANATH BUILDING, JKC COLLEGE CAMPUS, GUJJANAGUNDIA, GUNTUR, ANDHRA ...PETITIONER MR ATUI KUMAR TIWARI, PRESENTLY WORKING AS SECRETARY TO UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY FOR SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, ROOM NO.524, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAVAN, MR PREETHAM DATTA, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, THE DIRECTORATE OF JAN SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN, 10/4, JAM NAGAR HOUSE, SHAHJAHAN ROAD, NEW DELHI. MR B S KOTHARI, PRESENTLY WORKING AS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT ION, ROOM NO.203, PTI ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may sed to punish the respondents for their wilful, 2 deliberate and wanton violation of the order passed in W.P. No. 30813 of 2022, dated 17.10.2023, by this Honble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VENNA HEMANTH KUMAR(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) 3 The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 17.10.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.30813 of 2022. Sri P.Vinod Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri Bodduluri Srinivas Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that against the order in Writ Petition No.30813 of 2022, Writ Appeal No.203 of 2024 has been filed. Hence, prayed to close the Contempt Case granting liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps subject to the outcome of the Writ Appeal. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to take steps in accordance with law, subject to the outcome of the Writ Appeal. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 31.10.2025 MP 4 188 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO:2338 of 2024 Date: 31.10.2025 MP