Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93552 Court No. - 84 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2966 of 2025 Applicant :- Yogesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Singh Yadav,Sanjay Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
1. This is the second anticipatory bail application of the applicant.
2. First anticipatory bail application of the applicant being Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 11284 of 2024 (Yogesh Alias Yogesh Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and Another) was disposed of by this Court vide
order dated 22.01.2025, the order is quoted hereinbelow:-
"1. Heard Sri Deepak Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 83 of 2024, under Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Bevar, District- Mainpuri.
3. On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.
5. Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.
6. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrenders before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.
7. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.
8. With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed
of."
3. Keeping in view the aforesaid, no intefrence is warranted.
4. Since, applicant has filed this second anticipatory bail application on same set of
facts as raised in the first anticipatory bail application, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 22.01.2025, therefore, the present second anticipatory bail application is hereby dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Aditya Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad