Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42884 (KAR)

M/S ELLIS FASHION EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. N TEJAS KUMAR

CCC/957/2024 · 2025-11-13

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46424-DB C.C.C. No.957/2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.957/2024 BETWEEN: M/S. ELLIS FASHION EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.29 WHITE HOUSE, 3RD FLOOR ST. MARKS ROAD, BENGALURU 560001 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. JITENDRA D. MAJETHIA. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. RAJENDRA S, ADV.,) AND: N. TEJAS KUMAR THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KIADB (METRO RAIL PROJECT) KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVAN 1ST FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU - 560001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. H.L. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADV.,) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, AND RULE 5 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS RULES, 1981, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR DISOBEDIENCE/VIOLATION OF THE ORDER DATED 29.09.2023 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP NO.4125/2023 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A. Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46424-DB C.C.C. No.957/2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 29.09.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.4125/2023. The operative portion of the said order reads as under: "7. Since the matter falls in a very narrow compass and even in the light of admitted position referred to hereinabove, the petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.3 to take steps to issue necessary correction/corrigendum to include the remaining extent of 56.25 square meters which has been excluded treating as karab land, in the facts situation of the matter, within an outer limit of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, if no such correction/corrigendum is issued. The respondent No.4 shall thereafter process the matter as expeditiously as possible." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46424-DB C.C.C. No.957/2024 2. The respondent-accused has filed a memo along with the documents including the corrigendum notification dated 12.11.2025. 3. In view of the said corrigendum, there is compliance of the order of the learned Single Judge. Hence, the contempt proceedings are dropped. It is needless to observe that if the complainant still has any grievance, it is open for him to seek adjudication of the same in accordance with law. Notice issued to the accused is discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 3 Sl No.: 54