[2025:RJ-JP:51605] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12609/2025 Jagdish Singh S/o Shri Gyan Singh, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village And Post Kabai Thesil Nadbai Dist. Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Deputy Commissionerate Of Police, (Headquarters), Jaipur City, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- (A) By issuing an appropriate writ, order, or direction to the actions of the Respondents may be directed violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. (B) By issuing an appropriate writ, order, direction direct the Respondents to accord Retrospective Seniority, Notional Benefits, Selection Scale, and other consequential service benefits from the same date which is admissible and extended to the similarly situated persons. [2025:RJ-JP:51605] (2 of 2) [CW-12609/2025] (C) By issuing an appropriate writ, order, direction direct the Respondents to pay regular salary and due arrears and other service benefits with appropriate interest rate. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /136