APHC010169702019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 7337/2019 Between: 1. N.LINGAIAH,, S/O LATE N.MUNAPPA AGED 53 YEARS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS HEAD MASTER, Z.P.H.S., CHAVARAMBAKAM, NINDRA MANDAL, PUTTURU DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRCIT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION A P, IBRHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, A.P VIJAYAWADA, KRISHANA DISTRICT. 4. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR 6. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 7. THE PROJECT OFFICER, SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 2 8. K MOHAN, S/O. AND AGE NOT KNOWN, ACADEMIC MONITORING OFFICER, 0/O. THE PROJECT OFFICER, SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOLLURU RAGHAVENDRA VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondents: 1. M SURYA KUMAR 2. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) 3. REVANURU SUDHA RANI (SC FOR SAMAGRA SHIKSHA) 4. VAKA KRANTHI SRI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7337 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondents in not appointing the petitioner as AMO/ALS Coordinator on the deputation basis as illegal, arbitrary and consequentially direct the responds appoint petitioner as AMO/ALS Coordinator with all consequential benefits.” 2. None appeared for the writ petitioner, though the matter is posed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the writ petitioner. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Education Department is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.11.2025 PSK 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 50 WRIT PETITION No:7337 OF 2019 Date: 03.11.2025 W PSK