1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10858 of 2025 1 - Om Prakash Behra S/o Shri Kashi Ram Behra, Aged About 58 Years Working As Akushal Shramik (On Collector Rate), At Office Of Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department Sub Division No. 1, Pathalgaon, District Jashpur, (C.G.) R/o. Pangsuwa, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Engineer In Chief, Department Of Public Works, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) 6 - Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department Sub Division No. 1, Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 12/09/2025 1. By the present petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent authority to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.12 18:31:56 +0530 2 unskilled labour pursuant to the circular dated 05.03.2008 from the date when the similarly situated persons have been regularized. 2. Case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner is presently working on the post of unskilled labour in department of respondent as daily wager and has completed more than three decades of service. The petitioner is having all the requisite qualifications for holding the post of unskilled labour. The petitioner had submitted his detailed representation to the respondent authorities for considering his case for regular appointment on the post of Driver as he had already completed more than three decades of service. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the action on the part of the respondent authorities is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory in nature and also violative of the principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 15 & 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is a daily wager since long i.e, 1994. He would further submit that the State government has regularized the services of similarly situated daily wage employees on the basis of circular dated 05/03/2008, therefore, the petitioner is also entitled for regularization of his services on the post of unskilled labour. In support of his contention, learned counsel has relied on the judgment passed by this Court in the matter of Manoj Kumar Nirmalkar v. State of Chhattisgarh. 4. Per Contra, learned counsel for the respondents/State would oppose the contention of the counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 6. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Narendra Kumar Tiwari and Others v. The State of Jharkhand and Others held in para 11 as under: "11. Under the circumstances, we are of the view that the Regularization Rules must be given a pragmatic interpretation 3 and the appellants, if they have completed 10 years of service on the date of promulgation of the Regularization Rules, ought to be given the benefit of the service rendered by them. If they have completed 10 years of service they should be regularized unless there is some valid objection to their regularization like misconduct etc." 7. 8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the principles of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the petition is allowed. The respondent authorities are directed to inspect the muster roll and all records when the services of other daily wagers were regularized. If the case of the petitioner is also found to be similar to those daily wagers whose services were regularized, his services be also regularized from the same date with all consequential benefits. It is also directed that all this exercise be completed within a period of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok