1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6652 of 2025 Decided on: 19.08.2026 Shiv Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others ..Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Y.K.Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Arhant Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that main prayer of the petitioner in this writ petition was against the selection and appointment of respondent No.3 as Member, Child Welfare Committee, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. The respondent No.3 has since resigned from the said post, therefore, this writ petition to that extent has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed as having been rendered infructuous. The petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his surviving grievance if any, in accordance 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 19, 2026 Judge yogesh