APHC010532102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.27545 of 2025 Between: 1. TELLA NAVAMANI, W/O RAVI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O H.NO.7-225, VIJAYANAGAR COLONY, EPURUPALEM VILLAGE, CHIRALA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 2. . DUDDU BHAGYAMMA, W/O RAMASWAMI, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, R/O H.NO.7-226, VIJAYANAGAR COLONY, EPURUPALEM VILLAGE, CHIRALA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE BUILDING, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COLLECTOR, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA DIVISION, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, VETAPALEM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, AKKAYAPALEM VILLAGE, VETAPALEM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th and 5th Respondents in interfering with the wall construction of the petitioners land an extent Ac. 1.00 each 0.50 cents in Sy.No.427/3AlB of 2 Ramapuram Village, Akkayapalem Gramapanchayath, Vetapalem Mandal, Bapatia District without giving any notice or conducting enquiry is illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India. Consequently direct the 4th and 5th Respondents not interfere with the wall construction of the petitioners without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter in the Registry stating that he has received instructions from the writ petitioners that they are not pressing the Writ Petition for further adjudication and hence he sought permission of the Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a leave for filing fresh Writ Petition and he also endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the leave sought for. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 31.10.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.27545 of 2025 Date: 31.10.2025 siva