[2025:RJ-JP:51226] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15322/2025 Munfed S/o Mubeen, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Pipalkheda Police Station Gopalgarh District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15798/2025 1. Jilsaad S/o Shri Ramzan, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Jotruhalla, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deegh, Rajasthan. ( At Present Confined In District Jail Jaipur) 2. Faizal S/o Shri Razak, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Livasana, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deegh, Rajasthan. ( At Present Confined In District Jail Jaipur) 3. Ramiz S/o Shri Razak, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Livasana, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deegh, Rajasthan. ( At Present Confined In District Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain Ms. Nidhi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 18/12/2025 The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising [2025:RJ-JP:51226] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15322/2025] out of F.I.R. No.148/2025 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 303(2), 317(2), 319(2). 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2) & 61(2)(a) of B.N.S. and Section 66-D of I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and they are behind the bars since 31.10.2025. Counsel further submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. Trial/investigation of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accused- petitioners, namely Munfed S/o Mubeen, Jilsaad S/o Shri Ramzan, Faizal S/o Shri Razak & Ramiz S/o Shri Razak, shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- [2025:RJ-JP:51226] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15322/2025] (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /130-131