1 2025:CGHC:6302 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2563 of 2018 1 - Shiv Kumar Yadav S/o Late Shri Jageshar Yadav Aged About 56 Years R/o Village- Kanakpur, Police Station- Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.(Died and deleted) 2 - Pujari Yadav S/o Shiv Kumar Yadav Aged About 36 Years R/o Village- Kanakpur, Police Station- Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Sanjay Yadav S/o Lal Bihari Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/ovillage- Kanakpur, Police Station- Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ajay Kumar Yadav S/o Lal Bihari Yadav Aged About 23 Years R/ovillage- Kanakpur, Police Station- Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Lal Bihari Yadav S/o Late Makhan Yadav Aged About 57 Years R/o Village- Kanakpur, Police Station- Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Jasomati Devi W/o Lal Bihari Yadav Aged About 46 Years R/ovillage- Kanakpur, Police Station- Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 5 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The District- Magistrate, Balrampur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner No.01 : Mr. T.R. Chandrakar, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN Date: 2025.02.06 11:05:14 +0530 2 Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 04.02.2025 1. Mr. T.R. Chandrakar, learned counsel for the petitioner No.01. Also heard Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer : “It is, therefore prayed that, the Honourable Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quash the impugned order dated 27.10.2018 (Annexure-P/1) passed by learned Second Additional Judge of Additional Sessions Judge Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj in Criminal Revision No. R- 44/2018 (SHIV KUMAR YADAV & ANOTHER vs. SANJAY YADAV & OTHERS), in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner No.01 states that the petitioner No.01 has died during the pendency of the present petition. 4. The present petition so far as it relates to petitioner No.01 is abated, as the petitioner No. 01 namely, Shiv Kumar Yadav, has died during the pendency of the present petition. So far as the petitioner No.02 is concerned, he is alive but none has appeared on behalf of petitioner No.02 nor any representation is made on behalf of him. 3 5. It appears that the petitioner No.02 has lost interest in pursuing the matter due to efÒux of time. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed on this ground alone. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE Rahul Dewangan