Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 42870 (RAJ)
PIYUSH NAOLAKHA S/O LATE SHRI SHREECHAND NAULAKHA v. UNION OF INDIA
CRLMA/165/2025 · 2025-11-18
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42870 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42870 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45943] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 165/2025 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10351/2024 Piyush Naolakha S/o Late Shri Shreechand Naulakha, R/o D 001, Jewel Of India, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Accused In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus Union Of India, Through Inspector, Customs, Commissionerate, Jaipur. ----Respondent ______________________________________________ For Applicant/ Respondent : Jh fdU'kqd tSu For Accused/Petitioner : Jh ,l-,l-gksjk _______________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order Reserved on :: 07/11/2025 Pronounced on :: 18/11/2025 izkFkhZ@izR;FkhZ ;wfu;u vkWQ bf.M;k dh vksj ls ;g izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 528] ch-,u-,l-,l- izLrqr dj ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fo'ks"k vuqefr ;kfpdk ¼nkf.Md½ uacj 3468@2025] muokuh ;wfu;u vkWQ bf.M;k cuke fi;w"k uksy[kk esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 03-03-2025 dh ikyuk esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr tekur vkns'k fnukad 16-10-2024 esa la'kks/ku fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;k gS A lquk x;k A
[2025:RJ-JP:45943] (2 of 4) [CRLMA-165/2025] izkFkhZ@izR;FkhZ ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk Jh fdU'kqd tSu dk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr dk yxkrkj fons'k esa vkuk tkuk yxk jgrk gS ijUrq bl U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDr@;kph ds tekur vkosnu i= Lohd`fr vkns'k fnukad 16-10-2024 esa vfHk;qDr ds ikliksVZ dks lefiZr fd, tkus ds laca/k esa dksbZ vkns'k ikfjr ugha fd;k x;k gS uk gh bl laca/k esa dksbZ 'krZ vf/kjksfir dh xbZ gS A mudk fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZ@izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls tekur vkns'k fnukad 16-10-2024 ds fo:) ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds le{k fo'ks"k vuqefr ;kfpdk ¼nkf.Md½ la[;k 3468@2025] muokuh ;wfu;u vkQ bf.M;k cuke fi;w"k uksy[kk izLrqr dh xbZ A ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk vkns'k fnukad 03-03-2025 ds ek/;e ls mDr ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, ;g Lora=rk iznku dh xbZ fd izkFkhZ@izR;FkhZ lacaf/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k tekur vkns'k esa 'krsZ vf/kjksfir djus o ikliksVZ dks lefiZr djus ds laca/k esa izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djs A vr% mDr vkns'k dh ikyuk esa izkFkhZ@izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vfHk;qDr@;kph dk ikliksVZ l{ke izkf/kdkjh ds le{k tek djok;k tkos rFkk vfHk;qDr ij fcuk U;k;ky; dh vuqefr ds Hkkjr ns'k ugha NksM+us dh 'krZ vf/kjksfir djrs gq, tekur vkns'k fnukad 16-10-2024 esa la'kks/ku fd;k tkosA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd, gSa %&
1. Disha A Ravi Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), 2023 SCC Online Del 6051. 2. .Barun Chandra Thakur Vs. Ryan Augustine Pinto & Another, 2019 Supreme (SC) 2388. 3. Mahesh Sharma Vs.
Union of India, SB CRLMB No.3459/2025 dt.09.06.2025. 4. Ankur Agrawal Vs. Union of India & Another, SB CRLMB No.6128/2025 dt.16.06..2025 and
5. Nitin Nikhra Vs. State of M.P., MCRC No.13019/2019 dt.09.04.2019
[2025:RJ-JP:45943] (3 of 4) [CRLMA-165/2025] blds foijhr vfHk;qDr@;kph ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk Jh ,l-,l-gksjk dk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr dk yxkrkj fons'k esa vkuk tkuk yxk jgrk gS A U;k;ky; ls vuqefr ysus esa dkQh le; O;rhr gksrk gS vr% bl izdkj dh dksbZ 'krZ ugha yxk;h tkos A mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr tc Hkh fons'k tk;sxk ] mldh lwpuk U;k;ky; dks ns nh tkosxh A vr% blh izdkj ls mDr izkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, vkns'k fnukad 16-10-2024 esa la'kks/ku fd;k tkosA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd, gSa %&
1. Suresh Nanda Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2008) 3 SCC 674;
2. Mohammad Hanif Nurani Vs. The State of Maharashtra & another, CRLMAPP No.434/2024 dt.05.02.2025
3. Indrajit De Vs. Republic of India (CBI), CRL Rev. No.690/2023 dt.15.04.2024 and
4. Shahnawas Mohammed Hanif Malang Vs. Union of India & Others, 2024 SCC Online Del 5296. geus nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa o fordksZ ij euu fd;k A izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk llEeku v/;;u fd;k A bl U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu i= fnukad 16-10-2024 dks Lohdkj fd;k x;k FkkA mDr vkns'k ds fo:) izkFkhZ@izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds le{k fo'ks"k vuqefr ;kfpdk ¼nkf.Md½ la[;k 3468@2025] muokuh ;wfu;u vkQ bf.M;k cuke fi;w"k uksy[kk izLrqr dh xbZ A ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk vkns'k fnukad 03-03-2025 ds ek/;e ls mDr vihy dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, fuEu vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS %&
" Therefore, we grant liberty to the petitioner to move such an application for imposition of further condition(s) on bail, before the Court concerned, including the condition for surrender of the passport of the respondent. In view of the aforesaid observation, the special leave petition is disposed of.
Pending application (s),if any, shall stand disposed of."
[2025:RJ-JP:45943] (4 of 4) [CRLMA-165/2025] izdj.k dh leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa o ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 03-03-2025 dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ@izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr bl izkFkZuk i= esa lca/k esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 16-10-2024 esa fuEukuqlkj ,d 'krZ vf/kjksfir fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gS %& ** izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr U;k;ky; dh vuqefr ds fcuk Hkkjr ns'k ugha NksMsxk A ** izkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k blh vuqlkj fd;k tkrk gSA ;g vkns'k] tekur vkns'k fnukad 16-10-2024 dk Hkkx jgsxk A bl vkns'k dh ,d izfr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks fHktok;h tkosA (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J Rishikesh Soni/reserve